Portfolio staffing review

Put the staff plan on the same page as the work plan.

AMDEP reviews a synthetic commercial GC staffing packet the way a project executive would: active work, WIP exposure, phase coverage, PM and superintendent load, lookahead constraints, trade coordination, OSHA 30 and fall-protection coverage, QA/QC, punch, closeout, cost-to-complete risk, and value leakage from ad hoc personnel deployment.

Assignment analysis Ready Synthetic portfolio loaded

Before / after

Current setup vs. ML-reviewed staffing plan

Current setup

Imported staff plan

Travel load -- project-team travel hours per day

Deployment conflicts -- region, role-fit, phase, lookahead, safety, or cert drag

Coverage gaps -- missing PM, PE, superintendent, OSHA/safety, QA/QC, or closeout support

Run review to reveal Go-forward plan

ML decisions ready for operations approval

Travel load -- after phase, OSHA/safety, certification, and capacity checks

Recovered leadership capacity -- PM and superintendent capacity returned per day

Fully covered projects -- Waiting for staffing packet

Midcase 18-month value leakage reduced -- modeled organizational waste avoided by implementing approved ML decisions

Moves to approve -- staffing changes held for PM / ops approval

Profit leverage -- run-rate vs. peer-group pre-tax income proxy

Peer-group scale: regional commercial GC / CM portfolio, roughly 50-300 full-time employees and $100M-$700M annual revenue. Annualized value-protection run-rate: --. The 18-month horizon covers active work plus the next staffing cycle across retention, rehiring, ramp-up, management capacity, phase coverage, role fit, PM/superintendent burden, travel load, safety controls, QA/QC, punch, closeout, admin bandwidth, project-controls drag, and cost-to-complete movement.

SWFL command map

Long-haul staff conflicts and go-forward coverage

-- findings

Recommendation drivers

What moved the staffing plan

Operations exceptions

What project leadership reviews before the next staffing meeting

Project coverage -- fully covered projects in the portfolio

Burden watchlist -- project-team members carrying elevated travel, workload, or variance risk

Closeout / QA support -- capture candidates for inspection readiness, punch, and turnover proof

Operations review queue

Recommended moves awaiting operations review.

0 approved 0 rejected 0 needs review

Field review

Built for a phone in the trailer, truck, or jobsite office.

AMDEP Today

Field-safe workflow

Only the assignment, reason, and required action.

Superintendents and project leaders see the project, recommended person, constraint proof, and the action needed from operations.

Works in any modern browser on Android, iOS, macOS, Windows, ChromeOS, and tablets.
Installable as a PWA for demos and pilots.
Production sync would stay server-backed with approval history and audit logs.

System of record safe

Review first. Export second.

Adapter-ready outputs

Files your team can inspect, route, or import

Lineage

Data lineage and approval path

CSV inputs Schema validation Risk scoring Constrained optimizer Operations approval Export payloads

Demo notes

Synthetic portfolio, audit-ready workflow.

This demo uses randomized commercial GC staffing data. Economic impact is directional until validated against historical assignments, schedules, outcomes, overrides, and job-cost records.

Methodology brief